Interesting point. Once could buy three of the inexpensive cameras for the sales tax on the more expensive one.

A $150 versus a $5,000 Camera

Yes, if you are a geek with a microscope there are differences, but that's for geeks who look for these details as a hobby unto itself. For normal people who actually enjoy photos there isn't any difference for 80% of what you might want to shoot. Many people who read my site buy and own too many cameras. They enjoy dissecting photos for engineering details (as I often do on this site) more than they enjoy making photos. They're often the same guys who buy too many other toys. Those are the people who keep insisting you buy a more expensive camera, since it justifies their perverted hobby. It doesn't make any better photos.

Related Entries

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

  • The Placebo Effect

    So, how's that homeopathy working for you? The Strange Powers of the Placebo Effect - YouTube...

  • Coffee and a Devil's Star

    Reading another Jo Nesbo book (is that 'Joe' or 'Yo'?) and grabbing a cup at Williams on Northfield. I'm all out of order on this...

  • 5 Reasons No One Is Guestposting At Your (My) Blog

    Image via WikipediaWell, obviously, I've not been looking for guest posters. But apparently, it's a thing you can do to get more content and more...

  • Gearing Up for the 2011 Zombie Invasion

    Image by aeviin via FlickrPut on your brains, the zombies are coming. Zombies make their appearances here and there all through the year, but you...

  • My Mai Tai

    A Trader Vic mai tai, straight from the book. Remember, the only fruit juice in a mai tai should be lime. Yes, well, there should...

Close